QUELQUES PROBLÈMES
CONCERNANT LES RAPPORTS ENTRE LE PRÉSIDENT DE LA ROUMANIE ET LE GOUVERNEMENT ET
LA REPRÉSENTATION DE L’ÉTAT
Genoveva Vrabie
Abstract
Analyzing the post-revolutionary history of the relations between
the President of Romania
and the Government, several deviations are outlined and briefly commented.
First of all, the author discusses on the dismissal of certain prime-ministers
by the Romanian President, namely the “resignation” submitted by Mr. Petre
Roman “at the disposal of President Ion Iliescu”
in 1990 and the dismissal of Mr. Radu Vasile by presidential decree, even
though the Constitution, unrevised at that time, did not permit that.
Subsequently, the author comments on the relations between the
Romanian President and the Prime Minister regarding the Government reshuffle,
situations in which the Constitutional Court had to pull chestnuts out of the
fire, having, on this occasion, to interpret art. 85 paragraph 2 of the
Constitution in a manner highly criticized by doctrine, the Court being accused
of having changed from negative to positive legislator.
However, the issue that is essentially analyzed in this study is the
one regarding the interpretation and implementation of the constitutional texts
on state representation, interpretation that is quite differently approached by
the two heads of the Romanian executive. Analyzing the Constitutional Court’s
Decisions regarding this matter pronounced so far – especially Decision no. of
the summer of 2012 –, as well as the political events that preceded them, the
author states that, under the rule of the current Constitution, neither a
political act nor even a law that would divide the attributions of state
representation could be elaborated. Nevertheless, given that state representation
to the European Council and, in general, in all Institutions
of the European Union should be considered in the light of the realities that
involve the collaboration of state powers and their empowerment, the principle
should be rethought. An urgent solution would be to
create a political practice based on the consensus between the President and
Prime Minister of Romania,
and the immediately following one is the revision of the Constitution, the
rethinking of the principle of state representation, especially in European
Union institutions.
Title:
Issues regarding the relationship between the President of Romania and the
Government and the state representation
Keywords:
President of Romania,
Government, state representation, Constitutional
Court
pp 9-21 <<download>>
Communication
et RÉCEPTION DU DISCOURS PUBLICITAIRE
Doina Mihaela Popa
Abstract
Advertising, as entity of
modern creativity, is based on intertextuality and interculturality in its
persuasive process of social and emotional changing.
Due to the evolution of mass media
devices, the 20th century and the beginning of the current century
contribute to the intensification of an authentic phenomenon of mergence in the
collective imaginary: cinematography, fashion, television, politics, music,
art, and last but not least, Publicity, as forms of „soft-power”, cease to belong to a certain group, thus almost instantaneously
becoming legible at global scale; their intra and inter-semiotic translability
makes them adaptable to all cultures, irreversibly shaping the collective mentality. Through persuasion techniques, the
advertising strategies impose a daily „unconscious reading” on the consumer,
promoting brands to the detriment of products, thus building an imaginary
universe around brands as bearers of symbolic values. The analysis of the
psychological factors that influence the people’s behaviour while
buying/consuming by means of advertising represents a vast field where the
psychological factors hold the upper hand; in this manner, perception –
rational, emotional or subliminal – is shaped by our individual history, by the
affiliation to one culture or another, less by the nature of the real stimulus
and more by the context, by the past sensorial experiences, by the daily
stereotypes, desires and projections. Learning,
imitation, conformity, but also
creativity and the desire for change represent the basis of the motivational
mechanism to buy or not to buy a product/service and they also constantly
determine our behaviour.
Title: Communication and
reception of advertising discourse
Keywords :
advertising discourse, collective imaginary, subliminal persuasion,
stereotypes, unconscious behavior
QUELQUES PROBLÈMES
CONCERNANT LES RAPPORTS ENTRE LE PRÉSIDENT DE LA ROUMANIE ET LE GOUVERNEMENT ET
LA REPRÉSENTATION DE L’ÉTAT
Genoveva Vrabie
Abstract
Analyzing the post-revolutionary history of the relations between
the President of Romania
and the Government, several deviations are outlined and briefly commented.
First of all, the author discusses on the dismissal of certain prime-ministers
by the Romanian President, namely the “resignation” submitted by Mr. Petre
Roman “at the disposal of President Ion Iliescu”
in 1990 and the dismissal of Mr. Radu Vasile by presidential decree, even
though the Constitution, unrevised at that time, did not permit that.
Subsequently, the author comments on the relations between the
Romanian President and the Prime Minister regarding the Government reshuffle,
situations in which the Constitutional Court had to pull chestnuts out of the
fire, having, on this occasion, to interpret art. 85 paragraph 2 of the
Constitution in a manner highly criticized by doctrine, the Court being accused
of having changed from negative to positive legislator.
However, the issue that is essentially analyzed in this study is the
one regarding the interpretation and implementation of the constitutional texts
on state representation, interpretation that is quite differently approached by
the two heads of the Romanian executive. Analyzing the Constitutional Court’s
Decisions regarding this matter pronounced so far – especially Decision no. of
the summer of 2012 –, as well as the political events that preceded them, the
author states that, under the rule of the current Constitution, neither a
political act nor even a law that would divide the attributions of state
representation could be elaborated. Nevertheless, given that state representation
to the European Council and, in general, in all Institutions
of the European Union should be considered in the light of the realities that
involve the collaboration of state powers and their empowerment, the principle
should be rethought. An urgent solution would be to
create a political practice based on the consensus between the President and
Prime Minister of Romania,
and the immediately following one is the revision of the Constitution, the
rethinking of the principle of state representation, especially in European
Union institutions.
Title:
Issues regarding the relationship between the President of Romania and the
Government and the state representation
Keywords:
President of Romania,
Government, state representation, Constitutional
Court
pp 9-21
--
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Tabel Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
-->
|