Sondaje 6

Din ceea ce stiu pana in prezent despre UMK, daca un prieten ar dori sa studieze la o Universitate privata si mi-ar cere parerea in privinta UMK
 
Genoveva VRABIE - QUELQUES PROBLEMES CONCERNANT LES RAPPORTS ENTRE LE PRESIDENT DE LA ROUMANIE ET LE GOUVERNEMENT ET LA REPRESENTATION DE L’ETAT

QUELQUES PROBLÈMES CONCERNANT LES RAPPORTS ENTRE LE PRÉSIDENT DE LA ROUMANIE ET LE GOUVERNEMENT ET LA REPRÉSENTATION DE L’ÉTAT

 

 

Genoveva Vrabie[1]

 

Abstract

 

Analyzing the post-revolutionary history of the relations between the President of Romania and the Government, several deviations are outlined and briefly commented. First of all, the author discusses on the dismissal of certain prime-ministers by the Romanian President, namely the “resignation” submitted by Mr. Petre Roman “at the disposal of President Ion Iliescu” in 1990 and the dismissal of Mr. Radu Vasile by presidential decree, even though the Constitution, unrevised at that time, did not permit that.

Subsequently, the author comments on the relations between the Romanian President and the Prime Minister regarding the Government reshuffle, situations in which the Constitutional Court had to pull chestnuts out of the fire, having, on this occasion, to interpret art. 85 paragraph 2 of the Constitution in a manner highly criticized by doctrine, the Court being accused of having changed from negative to positive legislator.

However, the issue that is essentially analyzed in this study is the one regarding the interpretation and implementation of the constitutional texts on state representation, interpretation that is quite differently approached by the two heads of the Romanian executive. Analyzing the Constitutional Court’s Decisions regarding this matter pronounced so far – especially Decision no. of the summer of 2012 –, as well as the political events that preceded them, the author states that, under the rule of the current Constitution, neither a political act nor even a law that would divide the attributions of state representation could be elaborated. Nevertheless, given that state representation to the European Council and, in general, in all Institutions of the European Union should be considered in the light of the realities that involve the collaboration of state powers and their empowerment, the principle should be rethought. An urgent solution would be to create a political practice based on the consensus between the President and Prime Minister of Romania, and the immediately following one is the revision of the Constitution, the rethinking of the principle of state representation, especially in European Union institutions.

 

 

Title: Issues regarding the relationship between the President of Romania and the Government and the state representation

 

Keywords: President of Romania, Government, state representation, Constitutional Court

 

pp 9-21   <<download>>



[1] Genoveva Vrabie, Ph.D., is Professor and President of the Board of  ”Mihail Kogălniceanu” University, Iaşi, Romania; contact: Cette adresse email est protégée contre les robots des spammeurs, vous devez activer Javascript pour la voir.


Communication et RÉCEPTION DU DISCOURS PUBLICITAIRE

 

Doina Mihaela Popa[1]

 

Abstract

 

Advertising, as entity of modern creativity, is based on intertextuality and interculturality in its persuasive process of social and emotional changing. Due to the evolution of mass media devices, the 20th century and the beginning of the current century contribute to the intensification of an authentic phenomenon of mergence in the collective imaginary: cinematography, fashion, television, politics, music, art, and last but not least, Publicity, as forms of „soft-power”, cease  to belong to a certain group, thus almost instantaneously becoming legible at global scale; their intra and inter-semiotic translability makes them adaptable to all cultures, irreversibly shaping the collective  mentality. Through persuasion techniques, the advertising strategies impose a daily „unconscious reading” on the consumer, promoting brands to the detriment of products, thus building an imaginary universe around brands as bearers of symbolic values. The analysis of the psychological factors that influence the people’s behaviour while buying/consuming by means of advertising represents a vast field where the psychological factors hold the upper hand; in this manner, perception – rational, emotional or subliminal – is shaped by our individual history, by the affiliation to one culture or another, less by the nature of the real stimulus and more by the context, by the past sensorial experiences, by the daily stereotypes, desires and projections. Learning, imitation, conformity, but also creativity and the desire for change represent the basis of the motivational mechanism to buy or not to buy a product/service and they also constantly determine our behaviour.

 

 

Title: Communication and reception of advertising discourse

 

 

Keywords : advertising discourse, collective imaginary, subliminal persuasion, stereotypes, unconscious behavior



[1] Doina Mihaela Popa, Ph.D.,  is Associate Professor at „Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University, Iaşi, Romania; contact: Cette adresse email est protégée contre les robots des spammeurs, vous devez activer Javascript pour la voir.

QUELQUES PROBLÈMES CONCERNANT LES RAPPORTS ENTRE LE PRÉSIDENT DE LA ROUMANIE ET LE GOUVERNEMENT ET LA REPRÉSENTATION DE L’ÉTAT

 

 

Genoveva Vrabie[1]

 

Abstract

 

Analyzing the post-revolutionary history of the relations between the President of Romania and the Government, several deviations are outlined and briefly commented. First of all, the author discusses on the dismissal of certain prime-ministers by the Romanian President, namely the “resignation” submitted by Mr. Petre Roman “at the disposal of President Ion Iliescu” in 1990 and the dismissal of Mr. Radu Vasile by presidential decree, even though the Constitution, unrevised at that time, did not permit that.

Subsequently, the author comments on the relations between the Romanian President and the Prime Minister regarding the Government reshuffle, situations in which the Constitutional Court had to pull chestnuts out of the fire, having, on this occasion, to interpret art. 85 paragraph 2 of the Constitution in a manner highly criticized by doctrine, the Court being accused of having changed from negative to positive legislator.

However, the issue that is essentially analyzed in this study is the one regarding the interpretation and implementation of the constitutional texts on state representation, interpretation that is quite differently approached by the two heads of the Romanian executive. Analyzing the Constitutional Court’s Decisions regarding this matter pronounced so far – especially Decision no. of the summer of 2012 –, as well as the political events that preceded them, the author states that, under the rule of the current Constitution, neither a political act nor even a law that would divide the attributions of state representation could be elaborated. Nevertheless, given that state representation to the European Council and, in general, in all Institutions of the European Union should be considered in the light of the realities that involve the collaboration of state powers and their empowerment, the principle should be rethought. An urgent solution would be to create a political practice based on the consensus between the President and Prime Minister of Romania, and the immediately following one is the revision of the Constitution, the rethinking of the principle of state representation, especially in European Union institutions.

 

 

Title: Issues regarding the relationship between the President of Romania and the Government and the state representation

 

Keywords: President of Romania, Government, state representation, Constitutional Court

 

pp 9-21


[1] Genoveva Vrabie, Ph.D., is Professor and President of the Board of  ”Mihail Kogălniceanu” University, Iaşi, Romania; contact: Cette adresse email est protégée contre les robots des spammeurs, vous devez activer Javascript pour la voir.

-- /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabel Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";} -->
Mise à jour le Mercredi, 04 Mars 2015 07:53